Turn evidence into progress.
Read the recorded result, its limitations and one focus for the next ride.
Choose a ride to review
#696 · Troon South Beach
2026-10-15 · 6.2 m best · 13 measured jump rows
Inspect jumps, comparisons and routeRESULT / COMPARISON EVIDENCE
Retrospective benchmark versus result
Earlier-session median
10.0 mRecorded session best
6.2 mActual minus reference
-3.8 mCalculated after the ride from 5 earlier-date sessions. Same beach; conditions and equipment may differ. This is a historical comparison, not a pre-ride forecast or an anticipated technique score.
Earlier sample range: 6.7–10.6 m. This is the sample minimum–maximum, not a prediction interval. It is recalculated from current recorded context; it does not change your jump evidence.
Inspect comparison sessions
This difference describes a result. Wind, water, equipment and execution vary; it does not establish a technique fault or prove improvement.
ANTICIPATED / ACTUAL
Pre-ride comparison unavailable
This session has no compatible saved pre-ride model snapshot. Its measured profile and earlier-session reference appear below. Historical reference values are not predictions, and no new prediction has been generated after the ride.
SESSION REVIEW / RECORDED EVIDENCE
What this ride tells you
- The recorded session best is 6.2 m.
- The top-five average is 5.9 m across 13 available jump rows.
- 0 of 13 recorded landing impacts exceeded 4 G.
Interpretation
Your strongest jumps cluster close to the session best. That supports repeatability within this ride.
Next session focus
Repeat the same approach and timing on the next suitable ride; record what changes before changing several variables.
Evidence confidence: Moderate for jump consistency; limited for cause. This is descriptive coaching, not proof of a technical cause.
WITHIN THIS RIDE / RECORDED METRICS
What differed on your higher jumps?
Higher group: 3 jumps at or above 6.0 m. Other group: 10 jumps. These are medians of available recorded measurements.
| Metric | Higher group | Other group | Difference | Measurements |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edge | 67.00 | 62.95 | +4.05 recorded units | 3 / 10 |
| Pop | 17.40 | 13.75 | +3.65 recorded units | 3 / 10 |
| Pop velocity | 18.80 | 20.80 | -2.00 recorded units | 3 / 10 |
| Landing impact | 2.70 | 3.25 | -0.55 G | 3 / 10 |
Method and limits
The higher group is the top 20% by height, rounded up with a minimum of three, including all ties at its boundary. Each metric needs at least three measurements in both groups. Missing values are excluded; zero measurements remain valid. A larger edge, pop or pop-velocity value is not automatically better. These are associations, not proof of cause; wind, tack and approach can vary within a ride.
SESSION / SIX-AXIS EVIDENCE
The performance fingerprint
Current measured ride versus the median of up to five preceding sessions. Each axis shows its original measurement in the table; missing axes remain gaps; available measurements stay visible as points and connected segments.
| Axis | Current | Recent reference | Earlier rides |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 6.2 m | 10.0 m | 5 / 5 |
| Airtime | 3.5 s | 4.4 s | 5 / 5 |
| Edge | 63.1 source | 56.6 source | 5 / 5 |
| Pop | 15.1 source | 15.8 source | 5 / 5 |
| Pop velocity | 19.3 source | 27.4 source | 5 / 5 |
| Landing impact | 3.2 source | 2.9 source | 5 / 5 |
Common scales across the loaded 2026 archive: height uses 20 m; other axes use the 95th percentile of measured session values. Values above the scale are visually capped. This is not a technique score. Landing impact is direction-reversed: lower recorded impact means a softer landing and plots farther outward; higher impact means a harder landing and plots inward. Reference values require three valid earlier-date rides.