Turn evidence into progress.
Read the recorded result, its limitations and one focus for the next ride.
Choose a ride to review
#686 · Troon South Beach
2026-09-18 · 9.7 m best · 23 measured jump rows
Inspect jumps, comparisons and routeRESULT / COMPARISON EVIDENCE
Retrospective benchmark versus result
Earlier-session median
10.1 mRecorded session best
9.7 mActual minus reference
-0.4 mCalculated after the ride from 5 earlier-date sessions. Same beach; conditions and equipment may differ. This is a historical comparison, not a pre-ride forecast or an anticipated technique score.
Earlier sample range: 8.2–11.6 m. This is the sample minimum–maximum, not a prediction interval. It is recalculated from current recorded context; it does not change your jump evidence.
Inspect comparison sessions
This difference describes a result. Wind, water, equipment and execution vary; it does not establish a technique fault or prove improvement.
ANTICIPATED / ACTUAL
Pre-ride comparison unavailable
This session has no compatible saved pre-ride model snapshot. Its measured profile and earlier-session reference appear below. Historical reference values are not predictions, and no new prediction has been generated after the ride.
SESSION REVIEW / RECORDED EVIDENCE
What this ride tells you
- The recorded session best is 9.7 m.
- The top-five average is 9.0 m across 23 available jump rows.
- 2 of 23 recorded landing impacts exceeded 4 G.
Interpretation
Your strongest jumps cluster close to the session best. That supports repeatability within this ride. Wind or equipment context is incomplete, so no cause is assigned.
Next session focus
Repeat the same approach and timing on the next suitable ride; record what changes before changing several variables.
Evidence confidence: Moderate for jump consistency; limited for cause. This is descriptive coaching, not proof of a technical cause.
WITHIN THIS RIDE / RECORDED METRICS
What differed on your higher jumps?
Higher group: 5 jumps at or above 8.6 m. Other group: 18 jumps. These are medians of available recorded measurements.
| Metric | Higher group | Other group | Difference | Measurements |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edge | 61.30 | 58.15 | +3.15 recorded units | 5 / 18 |
| Landing impact | 2.50 | 2.60 | -0.10 G | 5 / 18 |
Method and limits
The higher group is the top 20% by height, rounded up with a minimum of three, including all ties at its boundary. Each metric needs at least three measurements in both groups. Missing values are excluded; zero measurements remain valid. A larger edge, pop or pop-velocity value is not automatically better. These are associations, not proof of cause; wind, tack and approach can vary within a ride.
SESSION / SIX-AXIS EVIDENCE
The performance fingerprint
Current measured ride versus the median of up to five preceding sessions. Each axis shows its original measurement in the table; missing axes remain gaps; available measurements stay visible as points and connected segments.
| Axis | Current | Recent reference | Earlier rides |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 9.7 m | 12.1 m | 5 / 5 |
| Airtime | 4.3 s | 4.4 s | 5 / 5 |
| Edge | 58.9 source | 58.3 source | 4 / 5 |
| Pop | — source | 12.2 source | 4 / 5 |
| Pop velocity | — source | 28.2 source | 4 / 5 |
| Landing impact | 2.5 source | 2.9 source | 5 / 5 |
Common scales across the loaded 2026 archive: height uses 20 m; other axes use the 95th percentile of measured session values. Values above the scale are visually capped. This is not a technique score. Landing impact is direction-reversed: lower recorded impact means a softer landing and plots farther outward; higher impact means a harder landing and plots inward. Reference values require three valid earlier-date rides.